From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 5, 2018
61 Misc. 3d 148 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

570363/18

12-05-2018

Jeff SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KNIGHTS COLLISION EXPERTS INC., Defendant-Respondent.


Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Verna L. Saunders, J.), entered November 16, 2016, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the action at the close of plaintiff's case.

Judgment (Verna L. Saunders, J.), entered November 16, 2016, affirmed, without costs.

The trial court correctly dismissed the action at the close of plaintiff's case. Even affording plaintiff every favorable inference that reasonably could be drawn from the evidence adduced at trial (see Szczerbiak v. Pilat , 90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997] ), we agree that he failed to establish a prima facie case against defendant for alleged property damage to his vehicle. Despite being given ample opportunity to do so, plaintiff failed to present any competent evidence to establish that he owned the vehicle at issue or expended any monies for repairs.

We also take judicial notice of the fact that, subsequent to the entry of the judgment appealed from, plaintiff obtained a $2,726.99 recovery against the City of New York for the damages to the vehicle at issue in this case.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 5, 2018
61 Misc. 3d 148 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

Smith v. Knights Collision Experts Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Jeff Smith, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Knights Collision Experts Inc.…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Dec 5, 2018

Citations

61 Misc. 3d 148 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 51734
111 N.Y.S.3d 798

Citing Cases

Rosa v. 1003 Willoughby Assocs.

Here, only the curb in front of plaintiff's home sustained damage, and it is the City's duty to repair the…