From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jun 13, 2014
Case No. 5:13-cv-01198-WMA-HGD (N.D. Ala. Jun. 13, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 5:13-cv-01198-WMA-HGD

06-13-2014

JEFFERY A. SMITH, Petitioner v. WARDEN KENNETH JONES, III, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondents


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 21, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation have been filed by petitioner or respondents.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

__________

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jun 13, 2014
Case No. 5:13-cv-01198-WMA-HGD (N.D. Ala. Jun. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY A. SMITH, Petitioner v. WARDEN KENNETH JONES, III, and THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 13, 2014

Citations

Case No. 5:13-cv-01198-WMA-HGD (N.D. Ala. Jun. 13, 2014)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Barrett

That marked the conclusion of the Rule 32 appeal for purposes of § 2244(d)(2). See San Martin v. McNeil, 633…