From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Holliman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
CV 312-074 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CV 312-074

11-19-2012

DALVIN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Warden HOLLIMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORIGINAL


ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and this case is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia.

_______________

UNITED STAGES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Holliman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION
Nov 19, 2012
CV 312-074 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Holliman

Case Details

Full title:DALVIN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Warden HOLLIMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

CV 312-074 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Canning v. Andrews

Parker, Carlton McCarty, for appellant. — The separate property of the defendant's second wife upon which she…

T. N.O. Ry. Co. v. Speights

Denman, Franklin, Cobbs McGown, for plaintiff in error. — The trial court erred in not directing the jury to…