From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Heyns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2013
Case No. 12-11373 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11373

07-31-2013

Frederick Smith, #158371, Plaintiff, v. Daniel Heyns, et al., Defendants.


Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds


ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ACCEPTING AND

ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 21, 2013 REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [74]

This matter is before the Court on the magistrate judge's June 21, 2013 report and recommendation on four motions on Plaintiff Frederick Smith's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner rights suit regarding his right to parole in state prison and actions that he alleges various prison officials took against him that violated his constitutional rights, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and state laws. (Dkt. 74, RR.) The magistrate judge recommended denying Plaintiff's motion to stay the summary judgment motions so that discovery may go forth, denying Plaintiff's second motion for leave to amend, granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. (RR at 2.)

Plaintiff has objected to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. (Dkt. 75.) Being fully advised in the premises, having read the pleadings and the magistrate judge's recommendation, and having conducted a de novo review of Plaintiff's objections, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and accepts and adopts it. (Dkt. 74.) The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections. (Dkt. 75.)

The Court therefore: DENIES Plaintiff's second motion to stay summary judgment (dkt. 70); DENIES Plaintiff's second motion for leave to amend (dkt. 65) and GRANTS Defendants' motions for summary judgment (dkt. 59, 69). The Court also declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claim. No claims are left pending; the Court will issue a judgment in connection with this case.

So ordered.

_____________

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July 31, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager

Acting in the Absence of Carol A. Hemeyer


Summaries of

Smith v. Heyns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 31, 2013
Case No. 12-11373 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Heyns

Case Details

Full title:Frederick Smith, #158371, Plaintiff, v. Daniel Heyns, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-11373 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Altman v. King

" Greenholtz, 442 U.S. at 7. "Indeed, it is difficult to believe that any two prisoners could ever be…

Hall v. Smith

To state a claim for relief under § 1983, “‘a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant,…