Opinion
2017–00744 Index No. 609174/16
02-14-2018
Christopher J. SMITH, respondent, v. Nelson Y. FUENTES, appellant.
Russo & Tambasco, Melville, NY (Yamile R. Al-Sullami and Christopher M. Gavin of counsel), for appellant. Rosenberg & Gluck, LLP, Holtsville, NY (Erin M. Hargis and Megan Mackenzie of counsel), for respondent.
Russo & Tambasco, Melville, NY (Yamile R. Al-Sullami and Christopher M. Gavin of counsel), for appellant.
Rosenberg & Gluck, LLP, Holtsville, NY (Erin M. Hargis and Megan Mackenzie of counsel), for respondent.
SHERI S. ROMAN, J.P., JEFFREY A. COHEN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated January 13, 2017, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by demonstrating that the sole proximate cause of the subject accident was the defendant's violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141 in making a left turn when it was not reasonably safe to do so, directly into the path of the plaintiff's oncoming vehicle (seeMei–Hua Gao v. Makrinos , 147 A.D.3d 747, 747, 45 N.Y.S.3d 805; Attl v. Spetler , 137 A.D.3d 1176, 1176–1177, 28 N.Y.S.3d 699 ; Ducie v. Ippolito , 95 A.D.3d 1067, 1067, 944 N.Y.S.2d 275 ). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff was comparatively at fault in the happening of the accident (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp. , 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572 ).
The defendant's remaining contention that the plaintiff's motion was premature is without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ROMAN, J.P., COHEN, HINDS–RADIX and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.