From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Eike

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv85-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv85-MHT (WO)

02-20-2013

PETER J. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT EIKE, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 56) is adopted.
(2) Defendant Robert Eike's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 49) is granted.
(3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Eike and against plaintiff Peter J. Smith, with plaintiff Smith taking nothing by his complaint.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Smith, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Eike

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv85-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Eike

Case Details

Full title:PETER J. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT EIKE, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv85-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Feb. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

Smith v. City of Montgomery

Cf. Smith v. Eike, No. 2:12CV85-MHT, 2013 WL 639187, at *6 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 9, 2013), report and…

Smith v. Adrian

See, e.g., Smith v. Adrian, Case No. 2:23-cv-00191-MHT-KFP (Doc. No. 9 at 4-6) (order requiring Smith to…