From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. California Board of Education

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 10, 2014
Case No. CV 13-5395 FMO(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2014)

Summary

adopting report & recommendation

Summary of this case from Love v. Milan Special Sch. Dist.

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-5395 FMO(PJW)

11-10-2014

MARVIN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion to dismiss, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted with prejudice as to Plaintiff's First Amendment freedom of association and Title VI claims and that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed on his remaining claims.

DATED: November 10, 2014

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. California Board of Education

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 10, 2014
Case No. CV 13-5395 FMO(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2014)

adopting report & recommendation

Summary of this case from Love v. Milan Special Sch. Dist.
Case details for

Smith v. California Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 13-5395 FMO(PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Profita v. Puckett

Cf. Pi Lambda Phi Fraternity v. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 229 F.3d 435, 447 (3rd Cir. 2000) (in upholding the…

Posey v. S.F. Unified Sch. Dist.

As a threshold matter, Parent Plaintiffs cannot bring a Title VI because Parent Plaintiffs are not the…