From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2011
420 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-2208.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 4, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01757-MBS).

Adrian Marion Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Adrian Marion Smith appeals from the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice and for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-01757-MBS, 2010 WL 4027972 (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2011
420 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire

Case Details

Full title:Adrian Marion SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE NORTH AMERICA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

420 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Tina

Thus, Plaintiff's claims, that may be liberally construed to relate to possible deliberate indifference to…