From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bentley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 4, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2334 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-2334 MCE CKD PS

12-04-2015

JOLENE SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KELLEY BENTLEY, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se. Plaintiffs have filed a supplemental application to proceed in forma pauperis in which plaintiff Smith states that her monthly take home pay is $700. Plaintiff Herman states that she has assets in the amount of $56,000.

Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). In addition, a $50.00 general administrative fee for civil cases must be paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(b). The court may authorize the commencement of an action "without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who makes affidavit that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The combined amount of plaintiffs' income and assets shows that plaintiffs are able to pay the filing fee and costs. Thus, plaintiffs have made an inadequate showing of indigency. See Alexander v. Carson Adult High Sch., 9 F.3d 1448 (9th Cir. 1993); California Men's Colony v. Rowland, 939 F.2d 854, 858 (9th Cir. 1991); Stehouwer v. Hennessey, 841 F. Supp. 316, (N.D. Cal. 1994).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs are granted fourteen days in which to submit the appropriate fees to the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to pay the filing and general administrative fees in the amount of $400 will result in a recommendation that the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and the instant action be dismissed without prejudice. Dated: December 4, 2015

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 smith2334.ifp.den


Summaries of

Smith v. Bentley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 4, 2015
No. 2:15-cv-2334 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Bentley

Case Details

Full title:JOLENE SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KELLEY BENTLEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 4, 2015

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2334 MCE CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2015)