From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Bell

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 22, 1980
273 S.E.2d 404 (Ga. 1980)

Opinion

36775.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 10, 1980.

DECIDED OCTOBER 22, 1980.

Habeas corpus; extradition. Bartow Superior Court. Before Judge Pope.

Ben Lancaster, for appellant. Charles Crawford, District Attorney, for appellee.


The burden of proof in an extradition case is on the person resisting extradition once the State has made a prima facie case that the extradition is proper. Hutson v. Stoner, 244 Ga. 52 ( 257 S.E.2d 538) (1979). The evidence here supports the habeas court's ruling that the extradition papers are in order and that the petitioner is the person named in the proceedings. The summary nature of extradition does not deny petitioner due process. McCullough v. Stynchcombe, 243 Ga. 24 ( 252 S.E.2d 453) (1979).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED OCTOBER 10, 1980 — DECIDED OCTOBER 22, 1980.


Summaries of

Smith v. Bell

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 22, 1980
273 S.E.2d 404 (Ga. 1980)
Case details for

Smith v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. BELL

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 22, 1980

Citations

273 S.E.2d 404 (Ga. 1980)
273 S.E.2d 404

Citing Cases

Covert v. Lee

Hutson v. Stoner, 244 Ga. 52 ( 257 S.E.2d 538) (1979)." Smith v. Bell, 246 Ga. 577 ( 272 S.E.2d 309) (1980).…