From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 30, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-420 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-420.

December 30, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on December 22, 2008, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision that Plaintiff was not disabled and therefore not entitled to benefits under the Act be AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 30, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-420 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Dec 30, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cv-420 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Dunavan v. Berryhill

An ALJ may consider the insufficiency of medical data relied upon to support a treating physician's opinion.…