Smith v. Antonelli

Full title: PHILIP D. SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. BRYAN M. ANTONELLI, Respondent…

Court: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

No. 18-7381 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7381

01-25-2019

PHILIP D. SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. BRYAN M. ANTONELLI, Respondent - Appellee.

Philip D. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:18-cv-01676-RBH) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Philip D. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Philip D. Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Antonelli, No. 4:18-cv-01676-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED