From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Alvarado

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 28, 1999
737 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-0860.

Opinion filed July 28, 1999.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas M. Lynch, Judge; L.T. No. 97-14057 11.

Robert S. Glazier of Law Offices of Robert S. Glazier, Miami, and Touby Woodward, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellants.

Daniel M. Keil, Hialeah, for appellees.


Appellants seek review of orders that denied their motions to quash substitute service. They argue that the plaintiff did not strictly comply with the substitute service statutes as required. See Mercy Lu Enters., Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 681 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); § 48.161, Fla. Stat. (1997).

We agree with the appellants. Plaintiff failed to mail the notice of service and a copy of the process to appellant Randall Smith d/b/a Smith Trucking "forthwith," but rather mailed it approximately 115 days later. See Arison v. Offer, 626 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Additionally, the plaintiffs failed to file an affidavit of compliance with the court "on or before the return day of the process or within such time as the court allows." See § 48.161(1).

Accordingly, we agree with appellants' contention that the orders must be reversed because plaintiff failed to comply with the strict requirements of section 48.161.

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Alvarado

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 28, 1999
737 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Smith v. Alvarado

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL SMITH, d/b/a SMITH TRUCKING CO., and RUSSELL E. SMITH, Appellants…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 28, 1999

Citations

737 So. 2d 630 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)