From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smilow v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 6, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Burton S. Sherman, J.).


We agree with the IAS court that based upon the fact that the automobile accident occurred in Sullivan County, the residences of the material witnesses, and the Trial Calendars of the respective counties, this action should be tried in Sullivan County. While plaintiffs' medical condition is a pertinent consideration on this motion, under the circumstances, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that it warrants trial in New York County. Moreover, defendant has adequately satisfied the requirements for a motion to change venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) by identifying numerous witnesses, including emergency services personnel and eyewitnesses to the accident, all of whom reside in or near Sullivan County, and by setting forth the nature of their prospective testimony. (See generally, Forte v. Weiner, 165 A.D.2d 678.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Smilow v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Smilow v. General Motors Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LUDWIG SMILOW et al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 477

Citing Cases

Lawrence v. Volvo Cars of North Am., Inc.

In this action to recover damages for injuries sustained when plaintiff's Volvo car caught fire in Rockland…

Edney v. Raymond Corp.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez, JJ. The affidavits of plaintiff's investigator…