From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Small v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado, Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
Jul 14, 2009
Civil Case No. 08-cv-01864-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Jul. 14, 2009)

Summary

finding that plaintiff who alleged that SSA denied her access to a federal building housing that agency and other agencies could not sustain a due process claim because she could not establish that her ability to access a federal building represented a cognizable liberty or property interest

Summary of this case from Richards v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Opinion

Civil Case No. 08-cv-01864-LTB-KLM.

July 14, 2009


ORDER


This case is before me on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) (Doc 28) be granted. The Plaintiff has filed timely specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Defendant has filed its response to the objections. I have therefore considered the recommendation de novo in light of the file and record in this case. On de novo review, I conclude that the recommendation is correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc 28) is GRANTED and the above action is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Small v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Colorado, Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
Jul 14, 2009
Civil Case No. 08-cv-01864-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Jul. 14, 2009)

finding that plaintiff who alleged that SSA denied her access to a federal building housing that agency and other agencies could not sustain a due process claim because she could not establish that her ability to access a federal building represented a cognizable liberty or property interest

Summary of this case from Richards v. Soc. Sec. Admin.
Case details for

Small v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE SMALL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, U.S…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado, Lewis T. Babcock, Judge

Date published: Jul 14, 2009

Citations

Civil Case No. 08-cv-01864-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Jul. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Warrington v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

“Because the United States defines the terms and conditions upon which it may be sued, Plaintiff must…

Richards v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

The ability to enter a federal building is not, in itself, a cognizable liberty or property interest. See…