From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slotkin v. Mercedes-Benz of North America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 18, 2000

February 28, 2000

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated November 16, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, in effect, to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Kenneth J. Weinstein, Garden City, N.Y. (Paula Schwartz Frome of counsel), for appellant.

Frederic A. Wool, Woodbury, N.Y., for respondents.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for economic and emotional harm allegedly caused by the persistent malfunctioning of a Mercedes automobile that he leased from the defendant Rallye Motors, Inc. In opposition to the defendant's motion, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged mechanical difficulties caused any accident, injury, illness, or traumatic event which required medical treatment. Moreover, despite the plaintiff's purported fear of driving the subject automobile, and his access to two other family vehicles, he drove the vehicle in question a distance of 54,000 miles in three years. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for partial summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action on the ground that it lacked the requisite "guarantee of genuineness" first articulated by the Court of Appeals in Ferrara v. Galluchio ( 5 N.Y.2d 16, 21 ; see also, Ford v. Village Imports, 92 A.D.2d 717 ; Fusco v. General Motors, Corp., 126 Misc.2d 998 ).


Summaries of

Slotkin v. Mercedes-Benz of North America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Slotkin v. Mercedes-Benz of North America

Case Details

Full title:ROGER M. SLOTKIN, appellant, v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 510

Citing Cases

Luna v. American Airlines

Moreover, the New York courts have consistently recognized the potential viability of independent claims for…

Lopez v. Beth

Since a fair reading of the plaintiffs complaint indicates that he does not seek to recover damages based on…