From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 22, 2018
248 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D17–1882

06-22-2018

Lonnie Irvan SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nora Hutchinson Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted, after a jury trial, of aggravated assault of a law enforcement officer, resisting a law enforcement officer with violence, battery on a law enforcement officer, possession of burglary tools, and carrying a concealed weapon. On appeal, he challenges only the possession of burglary tools conviction. He contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal on that charge. We agree.

To prove the crime of possession of burglary tools, the State is required to prove that the defendant (1) intended to commit a burglary or trespass, (2) had in his possession a tool or implement that he intended to use, or allow to be used, in the commission of the burglary or trespass, and (3) did some overt act toward the commission of a burglary or trespass. See Thomas v. State , 531 So.2d 708, 709–10 (Fla. 1988). Here, the State failed to present evidence that Appellant committed a burglary or trespass, attempted to commit a burglary or trespass, or otherwise did some overt act toward the commission of a burglary or trespass. Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to deny Appellant's motion. On remand, the trial court is directed to vacate Appellant's possession of burglary tools conviction and to resentence him accordingly.

"Possession of burglary tools.—Whoever has in his or her possession any tool, machine, or implement with intent to use the same, or allow the same to be used, to commit any burglary or trespass shall be guilty of a felony of the third degree ...." § 810.06, Fla. Stat. (2016).
--------

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J. and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sloan v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jun 22, 2018
248 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Sloan v. State

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE IRVAN SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 22, 2018

Citations

248 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Sloan v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.

The state appellate court directed the state trial court to vacate Sloan's conviction for possession of…