From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sloan v. Freedom Sav. Loan Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 26, 1988
525 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-2138.

May 26, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frank N. Kaney, J.

Carolyn B. Freeman of Barco Freeman, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Richard L. Robison of Robison, Owen Cook, P.A., Casselberry, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a promissory note guaranty case.

We affirm the summary judgment and take this opportunity to rectify a situation we created in Lauxmont Farms, Inc. v. Flavin, 514 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). In Lauxmont, we said:

Although a default judgment can be entered to establish liability a trial is necessary to establish unliquidated damages. Therefore, the award of unliquidated compensatory damages by summary judgment in this case was error [citations omitted].

* * * * * *

Lauxmont Farms' fundamental due process rights were violated by the defective notice of nonjury trial for both compensatory and punitive damages as well as attorneys fees and costs.
Id. at 1134.

We are advised that this Lauxmont opinion has been taken to mean that attorneys fees and costs cannot be determined and awarded by summary judgment. This interpretation is reasonable because we said ". . . the award of unliquidated compensatory damages by summary judgment" is error. We should have said (and this author protests he meant to say!) "the award of unliquidated damages by default" is error.

Unliquidated damages are those which cannot be mathematically determined and are not specified in the defaulted pleading.

So, any claim for damages, liquidated or unliquidated, or for attorneys fees and costs can be decided by summary judgment. Unliquidated damages cannot be awarded after default without notice to the defendant of the hearing or trial where the damages are to be assessed and awarded. Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc., 432 So.2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Appellate judges are wont to decorate some of their opinions with Latin phrases. The appropriate one for this occasion is mea culpa.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sloan v. Freedom Sav. Loan Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 26, 1988
525 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Sloan v. Freedom Sav. Loan Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SLOAN, APPELLANT, v. FREEDOM SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 26, 1988

Citations

525 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Specialty Sols. v. Baxter Gypsum & Concrete, LLC

(citations omitted)); Johnson v. State, Dep't of Rev. ex rel. Lamontagne , 973 So. 2d 1236, 1238 (Fla. 1st…

R. Plants, Inc. v. Dome Enters., Inc.

As to the second issue, whether the trial court erred in awarding unliquidated damages without an evidentiary…