From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 14, 1984
323 S.E.2d 876 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

66137.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 14, 1984.

Drug violation. Muscogee Superior Court. Before Judge Land.

Richard C. Hagler, Herbert Shafer, for appellant.

William J. Smith, District Attorney, Douglas C. Pullen, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


On the first appearance of this case, we reversed appellant's conviction and ordered a new trial because the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to suppress evidence. 168 Ga. App. 58 ( 308 S.E.2d 6) (1983). On certiorari, the Supreme Court agreed that the denial of the motion was error, but reversed our order of a new trial, remanding the case to this court for consideration of other enumerations of error. 252 Ga. 435 ( 315 S.E.2d 865) (1984).

In the enumerations of error not concerning the denial of his motion to suppress, appellant complains of ineffective assistance of counsel because of the denial of a continuance and of the trial court's failure to control what appellant characterizes as egregious prosecutorial misconduct in examining witnesses and in argument to the jury. These are matters which are entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. See Sims v. State, 243 Ga. 83 (4) ( 252 S.E.2d 501) (1979); Kelly v. State, 241 Ga. 190 (3) ( 243 S.E.2d 857) (1978); Cook v. State, 157 Ga. App. 23 (3) ( 276 S.E.2d 84) (1981); Sanders v. State, 156 Ga. App. 44 (2) ( 274 S.E.2d 88) (1980). Our review of the record of this case does not reveal an abuse of the discretion with which the trial court is vested. As to the ineffectiveness of counsel, the record shows that appellant discharged his retained counsel two weeks before the date on which he knew trial was scheduled and retained another attorney who was then on a leave of absence from court. Under those circumstances, we find no merit in the two enumerations of error addressed in this opinion.

There being no basis in the issues considered herein for the grant of a new trial, we remand this case to the trial court with direction to follow the mandate of the Supreme Court by reconsidering appellant's motion to suppress.

Case remanded with direction. McMurray, C. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.


DECIDED NOVEMBER 14, 1984.


Summaries of

Slaughter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 14, 1984
323 S.E.2d 876 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Slaughter v. State

Case Details

Full title:SLAUGHTER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 14, 1984

Citations

323 S.E.2d 876 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
323 S.E.2d 876

Citing Cases

Slaughter v. State

On remand, we determined that the remaining enumerations were without merit and remanded the case to the…

Quinn v. State

Such matters are entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court. Slaughter v. State, 172 Ga. App. 578 (…