From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slaughter v. State

Florida District Court of Appeals
Apr 26, 2024
383 So. 3d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D2023-2724

04-26-2024

Marcus Deangelo SLAUGHTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Marcus Deangelo Slaughter, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

Marcus Deangelo Slaughter, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had given the petitioner a ruling on the pending pleading below).

Bilbrey, M.K. Thomas, and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Slaughter v. State

Florida District Court of Appeals
Apr 26, 2024
383 So. 3d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Slaughter v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marcus Deangelo SLAUGHTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida District Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 26, 2024

Citations

383 So. 3d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)