From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slater v. Stop Shop Supermarket Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted March 7, 2001.

April 2, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), dated June 20, 2000, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Sheldon Kahan, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Andrew L. Spitz of counsel), for appellants.

Hurley, Fox, Selig Kelleher, Stony Point, N.Y. (Glenn W. Kelleher and Peter Klose of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendants made a prima facie showing that they neither created the allegedly dangerous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of it. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Marukos v. Waldbaums, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 434; Sims v. Waldbaum, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 642; Cuddy v. Waldbaum, Inc., 230 A.D.2d 703). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion.


Summaries of

Slater v. Stop Shop Supermarket Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 2, 2001
282 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Slater v. Stop Shop Supermarket Company

Case Details

Full title:GRACE P. SLATER, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STOP SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 2, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 407

Citing Cases

Tiano v. Nick's Lobster Seafood Restaurant

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is…

Gloria v. MGM Emerald Enterprises, Inc.

The inference is reinforced by the defendant's own proof that it regularly inspected the dance floor and…