From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Slate v. State

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville
Feb 27, 1998
No. 03A01-9708-CV-00369 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 1998)

Opinion

No. 03A01-9708-CV-00369.

February 27, 1998.

Appeal from Sevier County, Hon. Chester Rainwater, Jr., Chancellor.

Affirmed and remanded.

John Wayne Slate, Sr., Pro Se.

John Knox Walkup, Attorney General and Reporter, and David T. Whitefield, Senior Counsel, Civil Rights and Claims Division, for Appellees.


OPINION


John Wayne Slate, Sr., who is incarcerated in a penal institution of this State, appearing pro se, appeals a judgment of the Chancery Court for Sevier County, which dismissed his complaint (which is styled a motion) seeking disbarment of Circuit Judge Ben Hooper and Attorney General Al Schmutzer, Jr.

The Chancellor dismissed the complaint on the ground that proceedings to disbar an attorney must be pursuant to Rule 9 of the Supreme Court, rather than T.C.A. 23-3-202, as alleged in the complaint.

In Ex parte Chattanooga Bar Association, 566 S.W.2d 880 (Tenn. 1978), our Supreme Court held that the provisions of T.C.A. 23-3-202, insofar as they address disciplinary proceedings against attorneys, had been superseded by Rule 42 of the Supreme Court, which is the predecessor to Rule 9.

Mr. Slate appeals contending that the Trial Court was in error in this regard and was also in error in not granting his motion to strike the date of the hearing because he could not be present.

Our review of the record and the briefs of the parties persuade us this is an appropriate case for affirmance under Rule 10(a) of this Court.

For the foregoing reason the judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed and the cause remanded for collection of costs below. Costs of appeal are adjudged against Mr. Slate.

______________________________________ Houston M. Goddard, P.J.

CONCUR:

______________________________________ Herschel P. Franks, J.

______________________________________ Don T. McMurray, J.


CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the results of the court's opinion in this case but file this separate opinion to address the court's concern that the record and the briefs do not explain why the child's surname is "Walker." While this concern is not germane to any of the issues on this appeal, the record contains the explanation the court is seeking. Stacy March Hannah's maiden name is "Walker." Because she was unmarried when her son was born, Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-3-305(b)(1) (Supp. 1997) required that the boy be given his mother's surname.

______________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE


Summaries of

Slate v. State

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville
Feb 27, 1998
No. 03A01-9708-CV-00369 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 1998)
Case details for

Slate v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WAYNE SLATE, SR. Petitioner-Appellant v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al…

Court:Court of Appeals of Tennessee. at Knoxville

Date published: Feb 27, 1998

Citations

No. 03A01-9708-CV-00369 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 1998)

Citing Cases

Goines v. State

Id; see also Wayne Davidson v. Roger Delp, No. 03A01-9711-CV-00518, 1998 WL 548750 (Tenn.App., Knoxville,…