From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sklaroff v. Ario

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 7, 2009
600 Pa. 106 (Pa. 2009)

Summary

hearing officer did not abuse his discretion by ruling that physician, who did not timely identify himself as a witness prior to hearing, could not testify in post approval adjudicatory hearing

Summary of this case from Roman Catholic Diocese of Allentown v. Bureau of Workers' Comp.

Opinion

Nos. 114 MAL 2008, 115 MAL 2008.

January 7, 2009.

Petition No. 114 MAL 2008 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Petition No. 115 MAL 2008 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Prior report: 937 A.2d 552.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2009, the Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Brief in Opposition and the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.


Summaries of

Sklaroff v. Ario

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 7, 2009
600 Pa. 106 (Pa. 2009)

hearing officer did not abuse his discretion by ruling that physician, who did not timely identify himself as a witness prior to hearing, could not testify in post approval adjudicatory hearing

Summary of this case from Roman Catholic Diocese of Allentown v. Bureau of Workers' Comp.

hearing officer did not abuse his discretion by ruling that physician, who did not timely identify himself as a witness prior to hearing, could not testify in post approval adjudicatory hearing

Summary of this case from Roman Catholic v. Bureau of Workers
Case details for

Sklaroff v. Ario

Case Details

Full title:Robert B. SKLAROFF, M.D., Petitioner v. Joel S. ARIO, Acting Insurance…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

600 Pa. 106 (Pa. 2009)
963 A.2d 906

Citing Cases

Sutton v. Commonwealth

We will not consider information not contained in the certified record. Capital BlueCross v. Pa. Ins. Dep't,…

Roman Catholic v. Bureau of Workers

For this reason, Hearing Officer did not abuse his discretion in sustaining Provider's objection to…