From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skinitis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 9, 2005
271 Ga. App. 549 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

A04A2191.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 9, 2005.

Motion to suppress. Bartow Superior Court. Before Judge Smith.

Jack J. Menendez, for appellant.

T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Rosemary G. Heidmann, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Louis Chris Skinitis was stopped for speeding, and he subsequently failed a field sobriety test. A search incident to his DUI arrest revealed marijuana in the driver's side door. Following his negotiated plea and conviction of speeding, driving under the influence, and possession of marijuana, Skinitis appeals the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress. We affirm.

A defendant waives any error in the denial of his motion to suppress by pleading guilty; therefore, this Court is precluded from reviewing that decision. Thompson v. State, 240 Ga. App. 539, 540 (2) ( 524 SE2d 239) (1999); Barber v. State, 231 Ga. App. 176 ( 498 SE2d 758) (1998). See also Hooten v. State, 212 Ga. App. 770 (1) ( 442 SE2d 836) (1994). This is true even when the prosecutor and the trial court agree that if the defendant pleads guilty, he would still be able to appeal the issue. See Davis v. State, 251 Ga. App. 436 ( 554 SE2d 583) (2001).

Judgment affirmed. Ruffin, C.J., and Bernes, J., concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 9, 2005.


Summaries of

Skinitis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 9, 2005
271 Ga. App. 549 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Skinitis v. State

Case Details

Full title:SKINITIS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 9, 2005

Citations

271 Ga. App. 549 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)
610 S.E.2d 571

Citing Cases

Maddox v. State

Accordingly, this Court is "precluded from reviewing that decision."Smith v. State , 350 Ga. App. 19, 20, 827…

Maddox v. State

Accordingly, this Court is "precluded from reviewing that decision."Smith v. State , 350 Ga. App. 19, 20, 827…