From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Skanes v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 22, 2008
NO. CIV-07-1184-HE (W.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2008)

Opinion

NO. CIV-07-1184-HE.

August 22, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff Wanda F. Skanes instituted this action seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her concurrent applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, who recommends that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed.

The parties, having failed to object to the Report and Recommendation, waived their right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (10th Cir. 1996). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); LCvR72.1. Accordingly, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Purcell's Report and Recommendation and affirms the final decision of the Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Skanes v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 22, 2008
NO. CIV-07-1184-HE (W.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Skanes v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WANDA F. SKANES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 22, 2008

Citations

NO. CIV-07-1184-HE (W.D. Okla. Aug. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Michael T. B. v. Kijakazi

To the extent Plaintiff now challenges that determination, the VE's opinion and Plaintiff's own descriptions…