From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sixty-Six Crosby Assoc. v. Berger Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1998
256 A.D.2d 26 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 1, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.).


The IAS Court properly denied the motion to compel plaintiffs to answer a second set of interrogatories since summary denial of such a motion is mandated when it is made without a proper affirmation of good faith as required by 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) ( see, Vasquez v. G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 A.D.2d 311; Matos v. Mira Realty Mgt. Corp., 240 A.D.2d 214).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Sixty-Six Crosby Assoc. v. Berger Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 1, 1998
256 A.D.2d 26 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Sixty-Six Crosby Assoc. v. Berger Kramer

Case Details

Full title:SIXTY-SIX CROSBY ASSOCIATES, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. BERGER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 26 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 846

Citing Cases

Weisenthal v. Gotham Realty Holdings

Consistent with the aims of the CPLR, the Part Rules are intended to fosterthe just, speedy and inexpensive…

Valentine v. Collins Bros. Moving Corp.

Preliminarily, the Court notes that defendants failed to submit a satisfactory affirmation of good faith as…