From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singleton v. Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 3, 1963
20 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 3, 1963


Order, entered on January 8, 1963, denying motion for preference in personal injury negligence action under Special Rule Regulating and Granting of Preferences in such actions of the New York County Supreme Court (now Bronx and New York Counties Rules, Part I, rule IX, subd. [3]) and order entered on February 8, 1963 denying reconsideration, unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion for preference is granted. Plaintiff established a prima facie case of serious physical injury by offering evidence of special damages of about $1,000, fractured leg, restriction in movement of spine, dizziness and recurrent headaches, plus the medical report which concluded that "the present condition may reasonably be assumed as permanently and partially disabling." In the absence of countervailing evidence, the preference should have been granted (e.g., Calanni v. Tranos, 12 A.D.2d 762).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Singleton v. Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 3, 1963
20 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Singleton v. Schultz

Case Details

Full title:ETTA SINGLETON, Appellant, v. IRVING SCHULTZ, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Tessier v. Wilson

Putting that observation aside, plaintiff's counsel has not defended the request for a preference on this…