From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. Deeksha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 29, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CA 07-00009.

May 29, 2008.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered November 29, 2006 in a divorce action. The judgment, among other things, distributed the marital property.

LAW OFFICE OF EVELYNE A. O'SULLIVAN, AMHERST (EVELYNE A. O'SULLIVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WATSON, BENNETT, COLLIGAN, JOHNSON SCHECHTER, LLP, BUFFALO (KRISTIN L. ARCURI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Present: Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Fahey, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting defendant interest on the net distributive award at the rate of 9% per annum commencing June 12, 2006 and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We conclude that the judgment in this divorce action must be modified in only one respect. We agree with defendant that she is entitled to interest at the statutory rate on the net distributive award from the date of Supreme Court's decision ( see CPLR 5002, 5004; Dempster v Dempster, 204 AD2d 1070, 1072), and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Singh v. Deeksha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 29, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Singh v. Deeksha

Case Details

Full title:AJIT SINGH, Respondent, v. DEEKSHA SINGH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 29, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 1379 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4161
855 N.Y.S.2d 925

Citing Cases

Smith v. Winter

We therefore modify the supplemental judgment accordingly. In addition, the court erred in failing to grant…