From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singer v. Bruner-Ritter, Inc.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
May 10, 1943
180 Misc. 928 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)

Opinion

May 10, 1943.

Levien, Singer Neuburger for plaintiff.

Freedman Greenberg for defendant.


Motion to strike out the defense, as indicated by paragraph "Fifth" of the answer, is granted. The defense is legally insufficient. The Executive Order No. 9001 [issued Dec. 27, 1941, 6 Federal Register 6787, pursuant to the First War Powers Act, 1941, U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 611] does not invalidate or render it illegal and void or against public policy. The contract sued upon is one in which defendant agreed to pay brokerage commissions for services in soliciting and obtaining a war contract. Whatever may be the rights of the Government under the Executive Order, the order does not give the principal the right to declare the contract void so as to deprive the plaintiff of the fruits of his labor but yet let the defendant have the benefits. ( Bradford v. Durkee Marine Products Corp., 180 Misc. 1049.) The defense is stricken out as legally insufficient.


Summaries of

Singer v. Bruner-Ritter, Inc.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
May 10, 1943
180 Misc. 928 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)
Case details for

Singer v. Bruner-Ritter, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN I. SINGER, Plaintiff, v. BRUNER-RITTER, INC., Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: May 10, 1943

Citations

180 Misc. 928 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)
42 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

Singer v. Bruner-Ritter, Inc.

October 15, 1943. Present — Martin, P.J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [ 180 Misc. 928.] Order…

Mitchell v. Flintkote Co.

The "checker-board" pattern imposed by Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins is necessarily unsuited to matters subject to…