From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sinensky v. Weiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-06239.

October 2, 2007.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for tortious interference with contract and for injunctive relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated April 28, 2006, which denied her motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant Arthur Weiner from, among other things, entering into a contract of sale for the shares of stock in a certain cooperative apartment, and from conveying such shares to anyone other than the plaintiff.

Elisheva Sinensky, Teaneck, New Jersey, appellant pro se.

Brill Miesel, New York, N.Y. (Mark N. Axinn of counsel), for respondent Arthur Weiner.

Rosen Livingston, New York, N.Y. (Benjamin R. Tessler of counsel), for respondents Frank Safra.

Arnold Garber, Steve Glass, Board of Directors of 1360 Ocean Parkway Owners Corp., 1360 Ocean Parkway Owners Corp., and United Management (no brief filed).

Before: Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant to the respondent Arthur Weiner.

The plaintiff failed to meet her burden of establishing irreparable injury absent the granting of a preliminary injunction ( see McLaughlin, Piuen, Vogel v Nolan Co., 114 AD2d 165, 172; After Six v 201 E. 66th St. Assoc, 87 AD2d 153, 156; cf. Seitzman v Hudson Riv. Assoc, 126 AD2d 211). Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction was properly denied.


Summaries of

Sinensky v. Weiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Sinensky v. Weiner

Case Details

Full title:ELISHEVA SINENSKY, Appellant, v. ARTHUR WEINER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7421
841 N.Y.S.2d 891

Citing Cases

MASSAPEQUA WATER DIST. v. N.Y. SMSA LIMITIED P'SHIP

Similarly, an "injunction, which is used to compel the performance of an act * * * is an extraordinary and…

Barouh v. Barouh, 2009 NY Slip Op 30952(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 4/20/2009)

The Court notes that in support of her receivership claim, the plaintiff actually cites the impending…