From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simon v. Bryski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 2000.

December 6, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 11, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.

Leonard Zack, New York, N.Y. (David Spiegelman of counsel), for appellant.

Montclare Wachtler, New York, N.Y. (Lauren J. Wachtler of counsel), for respondent Yeshiva Canoch Lenaar.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, FRED T. SANTUCCI, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, his alleged psychological and emotional problems do not fall within the scope of CPLR 208. That statute tolls the applicable Statute of Limitations where, inter alia, a person "is under a disability because of * * * insanity at the time the cause of action accrues" (CPLR 208). The Court of Appeals has held that "the Legislature meant to extend the toll for insanity to only those individuals who are unable to protect their legal rights because of an over-all inability to function in society" and that statute is to be narrowly interpreted (McCarthy v. Volkswagen of Amer., 55 N.Y.2d 543, 548).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Simon v. Bryski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Simon v. Bryski

Case Details

Full title:ERIC SIMON, APPELLANT, v. YAAKOV BRYSKI, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Metro. Transp. Auth.

CPLR 208 provides, in pertinent part, that where the plaintiff is suffering from the disability of insanity…

Ingvarsdottir v. Gaines, Gruner, Ponzini & Novick, LLP

Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the mental abuse she received from Bedi was of such magnitude that…