From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Renewal, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-302 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)

Summary

dismissing the complaint because the plaintiff failed to allege state action

Summary of this case from Harvey v. Renewal, Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-302

02-29-2012

ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR., Plaintiff, v. RENEWAL, INC., et al., Defendants.


Judge Cathy Bissoon


MEMORANDUM ORDER

For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) will be granted.

Plaintiff alleges that, while he was present and/or residing at Renewal, Inc.'s facility, counselor Frank DeClar sexually harassed him and place his hands on Plaintiff's buttocks. See Compl. (Doc. 6) at ¶ IV(C). On these allegations, Plaintiff purports to state claims under the 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments to the United States Constitution. Id. at ¶ III.

Assuming, arguendo, that Plaintiff can state viable claims under these or any other provision of the Constitution, the Court agrees with Defendants that he has failed to allege state action as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP, 615 F.3d 159, 175-76 (3d Cir. 2010) ("To prevail on a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege that the defendant acted under color of state law, in other words, that there was state action.") (citation omitted), cert. denied, -- U.S. --, 131 S. Ct. 1798 (U.S. 2011). There are no facts through which state action may be inferred, nor has Plaintiff offered any meaningful opposition to Defendants' Motion. Compare Pl.'s Opp'n Brs. (Docs. 25 & 26) (failing to respond to Defendants' substantive arguments for dismissal) with Arango v. Winstead, 2009 WL 3863335, *2 & n.1 (3d Cir. Nov. 19, 2009) (affirming dismissal with prejudice of lawsuit because, despite plaintiff's having received notice of relevant legal issue and opportunity to respond, he failed to identify facts inferring constitutional violation).

For the reasons stated above, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's lawsuit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge
cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail):

Alvin R. Simmons, Jr.

06144-068

FCI Gilmer

PO Box 6000

Glennville, WV 26351


Summaries of

Simmons v. Renewal, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-302 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)

dismissing the complaint because the plaintiff failed to allege state action

Summary of this case from Harvey v. Renewal, Inc.
Case details for

Simmons v. Renewal, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR., Plaintiff, v. RENEWAL, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-302 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)

Citing Cases

Harvey v. Renewal, Inc.

See Evans v. Renewal, Inc., No. 14-CV- 466, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124024, at *14 (W.D. Pa. Sept. 4, 2014) (J.…

Goodwin v. Renewal, Inc.

[ECF No. 18 ¶2]. This characterization is consistent with case law in this District addressing the status of…