From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Simmons v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 29, 2015
132 A.D.3d 1217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

10-29-2015

In the Matter of Terry SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Terry Simmons, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Terry Simmons, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to refusing a direct order, refusing to comply with frisk procedures, smuggling, possessing drugs and two counts of possessing contraband as charged in two misbehavior reports. After the penalty was modified by facility officials, the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Initially, the Attorney General concedes, and we agree, that, because the charges of possession of contraband contained in the misbehavior reports arose out of the same incident, the charge in the second misbehavior report is duplicative and should have been dismissed (see generally Matter of Cross v. Annucci, 131 A.D.3d 758, 759, 14 N.Y.S.3d 240 [2015] ). Because a loss of good time was imposed as part of the penalty, the matter must be remitted to the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision for a redetermination of the penalty on the remaining charges. Turning to the remaining charges, petitioner is precluded from challenging the determination as not supported by substantial evidence inasmuch as he pleaded guilty to those charges (see Matter of Smith v. Annucci, 126 A.D.3d 1198, 1198, 3 N.Y.S.3d 636 [2015] ; Matter of Sanchez v. Annucci, 126 A.D.3d 1194, 1194, 3 N.Y.S.3d 631 [2015] ). Finally, petitioner's contention that gaps in the hearing transcript rendered meaningful review insufficient is without merit (see Matter of Jamison v. Fischer, 119 A.D.3d 1306, 1306–1307, 989 N.Y.S.2d 706 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by aning so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of one charge of possessing contraband and imposed a penalty; petition granted to that extent, the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references to this charge from petitioner's institutional record, and matter remitted to the Commissioner for an administrative redetermination of the penalty on the remaining violations; and, as so modified, confirmed.

PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, LYNCH and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Simmons v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Oct 29, 2015
132 A.D.3d 1217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Simmons v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Terry SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 29, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 1217 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
132 A.D.3d 1217
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 7895

Citing Cases

Washington v. Lee

ot raising it in his brief (see Matter of Medina v. Five Points Correctional Facility, 153 A.D.3d 1471, 1471,…

Reed v. Annucci

Turning to the second determination, as petitioner pleaded guilty to the charges contained in the second and…