Opinion
September 27, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The trial court on this motion to correct the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5019 (a) did not have revisory or appellate jurisdiction to correct the purported error, as the proposed amendment would have affected a substantial right of the former wife (see, Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 A.D.2d 591, 592). Additionally, the error alleged by the appellant does not constitute grounds for relief under either CPLR 5015, or pursuant to the court's inherent power to exercise control over its judgments (see, Matter of McKenna v County of Nassau, 61 N.Y.2d 739). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.