From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silver's Lunch Stores, v. United El. L. P

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 27, 1932
146 Misc. 554 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)

Opinion

December 27, 1932.

Appeal from the City Court of New York, New York county.

Schmer Wechsler [ Joseph J. Mintzes of counsel], for the appellant.

Beardsley Taylor [ Jacob H. Goetz, William L. Ranson, Charles I. Taylor and Edwin D. Kyle, Jr., of counsel], for the respondent.


If plaintiff relies upon an actual promise or undertaking by defendant, it should plead the facts plainly and concisely, and eliminate from the cause of action all reference to duties supposed to be imposed by law.

Order modified by granting leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within six days after service of order entered hereon, and, as modified, affirmed, with disbursements to plaintiff. Upon service of amended complaint, judgment vacated; and, in default of service of such amended pleading, judgment affirmed, with costs.

LYDON and FRANKENTHALER, JJ., concur; LEVY, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Silver's Lunch Stores, v. United El. L. P

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 27, 1932
146 Misc. 554 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
Case details for

Silver's Lunch Stores, v. United El. L. P

Case Details

Full title:SILVER'S LUNCH STORES, INC., Appellant, v. UNITED ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 27, 1932

Citations

146 Misc. 554 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
261 N.Y.S. 714

Citing Cases

Lee v. Consolidated Edison Co.

The threshold questions are whether there is binding case law or administrative authority that the tariff is…

Ipco Hospital Supply Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Clearly Edison had no such duty. In Silver's Lunch Stores v United Elec. Light Power Co. ( 142 Misc. 744, mod…