From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silver v. Woodbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1918
185 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

October, 1918.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Jaycox, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, on the ground that plaintiffs' structures having been lawfully erected above mean high-water mark did not become subject to removal without legal process, when the sea had advanced so as to flow under them. The duty, if any, then to adapt the buildings in the new conditions of the sea's advance, so as to facilitate the public rights to cross, is not before us. Because of cross-appeals, the affirmance is without costs.


Summaries of

Silver v. Woodbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1918
185 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

Silver v. Woodbury

Case Details

Full title:BARNE SILVER, Appellant, and SILVER'S BATHING PAVILION, INC., Plaintiff…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1918

Citations

185 App. Div. 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Citing Cases

Tysen v. Cedar Grove Beach Corporation

Coupled with the fact that this reserved right to use the beach in connection with the fishery has not been…