From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silver v. Tops Markets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 16, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Negligence.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law with costs and new trial granted on damages only. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained to her head and neck as a result of being struck by a falling sign at defendant's store. Following trial, the jury found defendant negligent and awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $250 for past pain and suffering and no damages for future pain and suffering, past and future lost earnings, and past medical expenses.

Considering the ample and virtually uncontroverted evidence adduced by plaintiff with respect to damages, we conclude that the award of only $250 for past pain and suffering and the failure to award any damages for future pain and suffering, past and future lost earnings, and past medical expenses is contrary to a fair interpretation of the evidence and deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation ( see, CPLR 5501 [c]; Simmons v. Dendis Constr., 270 A.D.2d 919 [decided Mar. 29, 2000]; Quigley v. Sikora, 269 A.D.2d 812 [decided Feb. 16, 2000]; Kriesel v. May Dept. Stores Co., 261 A.D.2d 837; Restey v. Higgins, 252 A.D.2d 954, 955; Kennett v. Piotrowski, 234 A.D.2d 983, 984). We therefore reverse the judgment and grant a new trial on the issue of damages only.


Summaries of

Silver v. Tops Markets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Silver v. Tops Markets

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN SILVER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOPS MARKETS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 264

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Hickey

Based upon that evidence, we conclude that an award of $25,000 would be reasonable to compensate plaintiff…

Bright v. New York City Transit Authority

The trial court's decision to grant a new trial constituted a provident exercise of its discretion (see,…