From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 26, 1991
573 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-2098.

February 26, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County; Stanley Goldstein, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


The state properly concedes that the trial court erred in imposing an adult sanction upon the defendant, who was a juvenile at the time of the offense, without making the mandatory factual findings as to the suitability of adult sanctions as required by section 39.111(7), Florida Statutes (1987). See State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Green v. State, 506 So.2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

Silver v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 26, 1991
573 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Silver v. State

Case Details

Full title:MIKE SILVER, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 26, 1991

Citations

573 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Petithomme v. State

As the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing an adult sentence upon a defendant who was…