From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silken v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1951
278 App. Div. 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

January 29, 1951.


In an action to recover damages for breach of a covenant of quiet enjoyment in a long-term lease, defendant moved to set aside and vacate a default judgment, obtained by plaintiff after service by publication, and for leave to serve an answer and counterclaim pursuant to section 217 of the Civil Practice Act. The motion was granted without terms. A motion for reargument was made and on reargument the court adhered to the original decision, stating: "Whether or not defendant should be made to bear the burden of the sheriff's fees or the advertising costs is a matter which should abide the event when, as, and if, the trial of this matter is concluded." Order on reargument modified by striking from the last ordering paragraph the words "adhered to" and substituting in place thereof the following: "modified so as to provide that the judgment entered herein in favor of plaintiff against defendant on May 18, 1950, for $20,374.30 be and the same hereby is set aside and vacated upon condition that defendant pay the taxable costs to date, as well as plaintiff's disbursements." As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant, with leave to defendant to serve her answer and counterclaim within fifteen days after the entry of the order hereon. It was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant defendant's motion to open her default without imposing terms. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Silken v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1951
278 App. Div. 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Silken v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE SILKEN, Appellant, v. MARY T. FARRELL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

MATTER OF MARS

Constructive service is often no service at all and the mechanism is the fictional product of the necessity…

Firstenberg v. Bills

The proposed defense has merit ( Shapiro v. Weissman, 7 A.D.2d 752; Rose Factors Co. v. Schwarz, 16 A.D.2d…