From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silberstein v. First Wall Street Cap. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1987
128 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 2, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Gee-Bee, by its counterclaim, claims that it is entitled to attorney's fees and costs of litigation because the defendants and third-party plaintiffs instituted the action against it in bad faith.

Gee-Bee makes no claim that there is any statute, court rule or agreement between the parties that would afford it the relief it seeks. Absent such claim, there is no authority to grant Gee-Bee attorney's fees or costs of litigation, and the counterclaim fails to set forth a cause of action (Matter of A.G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. Lezak, 69 N.Y.2d 1). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Silberstein v. First Wall Street Cap. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 2, 1987
128 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Silberstein v. First Wall Street Cap. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK SILBERSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. FIRST WALL STREET CAPITAL CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 2, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Tamu Lola, LLC v. Walsam 40 E. 20 LLC

In the absence of a governing contract, statute, or court ruling, "there is no authority to grant [Defendant]…

Gagosian Gallery, Inc. v. Eurostruct, Inc.

Accordingly, the court, finding no need for any further discovery on the issues presented herein, (1) grants…