From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Silak v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 9, 1935
181 A. 68 (N.J. 1935)

Opinion

Submitted May 31, 1935 —

Decided October 9, 1935.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 114 N.J.L. 428.

For the respondent, Lichtenstein, Schwartz Friedenberg.

For the appellant, Collins Corbin.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Silak v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 9, 1935
181 A. 68 (N.J. 1935)
Case details for

Silak v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY SILAK, RESPONDENT, v. HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 9, 1935

Citations

181 A. 68 (N.J. 1935)
181 A. 68

Citing Cases

Francillo v. Latour

In Levine v. Goldstein ( Supreme Court, 1927), 5 N.J.Mis. R. 841; 138 Atl. Rep. 511, there was nothing to…