Opinion
04-01-2015
Jose Orellana SIGUENZA, appellant-respondent, v. CEMUSA, INC., et al., respondents-appellants.
Stuart R. Lang, New York, N.Y., for appellant-respondent. Molod Spitz & DeSantis, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Marcy Sonneborn and Salvatore J. DeSantis of counsel), for respondents-appellants.
Stuart R. Lang, New York, N.Y., for appellant-respondent.
Molod Spitz & DeSantis, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Marcy Sonneborn and Salvatore J. DeSantis of counsel), for respondents-appellants.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), entered July 11, 2011, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1), and the defendants cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal and cross appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal and cross appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the companion appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ; Siguenza v. Cemusa, Inc., 127 A.D.3d 727, 6 N.Y.S.3d 568, 2015 WL 1445624, Appellate Division Docket No. 2014–02578 [decided herewith] ).
DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.