Summary
stating that the corporate plaintiff was entitled to enforce a judgment that had been entered in its favor because it was a legal entity separate from its shareholders
Summary of this case from Manley v. Anbase Corp.Opinion
April 5, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as that judgment was superseded by the amended judgment; and it is further,
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the, right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the amended judgment ( see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
The corporate plaintiff, La Bella Notte, Ltd. (hereinafter Bella Notte), is a legal entity separate from its shareholders ( see, e.g., 5303 Realty Corp. v. O Y Equity Corp., 64 N.Y.2d 313), and as such is entitled to enforcement of the amended judgment that has been entered in its favor and against the appellant ( see, e.g., Independent Investor Protective League v. Time, Inc., 50 N.Y.2d 259).
This Court has already ruled that the plaintiff Dominick Signorile, a 41% shareholder in Bella Notte, has standing to pursue this lawsuit on behalf of the corporation ( see, Signorile v. Soniker, 220 A.D.2d 404; see also, Business Corporation Law § 626). John A. Keeffe, who is Mr. Signorile's lawyer, and whom this Court has declined to disqualify in the past ( see, Signorile v. Soniker, supra), was directed by the Supreme Court to enforce the instant judgment as soon as it was "properly entered" ( see, Order of Aug. 5, 1997). Accordingly, Mr. Keeffe has the authority to pursue the instant matter on his client's behalf.
There is no merit to the appellant's suggestion that Mr. Signorile is divested of standing and that Mr. Keeffe is deprived of the authority to act for him because after the issuance of the order appealed from the appellant acquired the interests of the other shareholders and it now owns a majority of the stock in Bella Notte.
S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.