From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sierra v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 19, 2019
No. 17-CV-10197 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2019)

Opinion

No. 17-CV-10197 (KMK)

03-19-2019

JOSE ANGELA RUIZ SIERRA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING R&R

:

Jose Angela Ruiz Sierra ("Plaintiff") brings this Action against the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner"), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the decision of an administrative law judge (the "ALJ") to deny Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits on the ground that Plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423 et seq. The Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison ("Judge Davison") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). (Dkt. No. 6.) The Commissioner and Plaintiff cross-move for judgment on the pleadings. (Dkt. Nos. 14, 18.) Judge Davison issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court deny the Commissioner's motion and grant Plaintiff's cross-motion to the extent that the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R. (R&R 56 (Dkt. No. 20).) No objections were filed.

Because no objections have been filed, the Court reviews the R&R "only for clear error on the face of the record." See Brennan v. Colvin, No. 13-CV-6338, 2015 WL 1402204, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Iannolo v. Astrue, No. 10-CV-7602, 2012 WL 523619, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 16, 2012) (same). Having reviewed the R&R for clear error and finding none, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety.

Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted to the extent that the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R, and the Commissioner's Cross-Motion is denied. Accordingly, the decision of the ALJ is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motions. (Dkt. Nos. 14, 18). SO ORDERED. Dated: March 19, 2019

White Plains, New York

/s/_________

KENNETH M. KARAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sierra v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 19, 2019
No. 17-CV-10197 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Sierra v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANGELA RUIZ SIERRA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 19, 2019

Citations

No. 17-CV-10197 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

Scatola v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

See Sierra v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 17-CV-10197 (KMK) (PED), 2018 WL 7681060, at *21 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6,…

Randle v. Saul

See Sierra v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2018 WL 7681060, at *26 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2018) (emphasis in original),…