From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siegel v. Seidenberg, Keroes Dratfield, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 1932
237 App. Div. 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

December 20, 1932.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Harmon Ackerman of counsel [ Edyth Widdi with him on the brief], for the appellant.

Jacob M. Zinaman, for the respondent.

Present — FINCH, P.J., MERRELL, MARTIN, SHERMAN and TOWNLEY, JJ.


The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. A judgment directing the payment of a sum of money is enforcible only by execution. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 504, 505; Harris v. Elliott, 163 N.Y. 269.)


Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.


Summaries of

Siegel v. Seidenberg, Keroes Dratfield, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 1932
237 App. Div. 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Siegel v. Seidenberg, Keroes Dratfield, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP SIEGEL, Respondent, v. SEIDENBERG, KEROES DRATFIELD, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1932

Citations

237 App. Div. 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
260 N.Y.S. 852