From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Siebert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1999
730 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-2347

Opinion filed April 28, 1999. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1999

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Michael A. Genden, Judge, L.T. No. 95-32486.

William Earl Siebert, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sylvie Perez-Posner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.


We reverse the order summarily denying defendant's motion for post-conviction relief. As the supreme court stated inState v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 237 (Fla. 1996), upon review of the record in this case:

it cannot be said that [defendant's] allegations of the misadvise of counsel are `conclusively' rebutted by the plea colloquy. While the plea colloquy may appear to be some evidence contrary to defendant's claim, it is not so clear or so inconsistent with the claim so as to `conclusively' rebut it.

The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing.


Summaries of

Siebert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 28, 1999
730 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Siebert v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM EARL SIEBERT, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 28, 1999

Citations

730 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Rivero v. State

Hector Manuel Rivero appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal…