From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shurter v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 4, 1942
263 App. Div. 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

March 4, 1942.

Appeal from Tompkins County.

Present — Hill, P.J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ.


The action was brought to recover damages for fraud and deceit, it being alleged that the defendants, as principal and agent, induced plaintiffs to purchase certain real property on which were located certain wells, the water of which was contaminated. The court properly submitted to the jury all of the questions of actionable fraud as questions of fact and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence. The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Shurter v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 4, 1942
263 App. Div. 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Shurter v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:H. LEON SHURTER and BLANCHE E. SHURTER, Respondents, v. ALICE E. BAILEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1942

Citations

263 App. Div. 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

N. Leasing Sys., Inc. v. Kollars

Judgment (Michael L. Katz, J.), entered December 30, 2015, affirmed, with $25 costs. Viewing the evidence in…