From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shufty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 1, 1982
419 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1678.

October 1, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, John S. Andrews, J.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

Floyd C. Shufty, pro se.


Counsel for appellant submitted the instant appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have carefully reviewed the entire record on appeal and have concluded that no reversible error exists.

Concerning appellant's extradition process, pursuant to section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981), a copy of a warrant supported by an affidavit made before a committing magistrate of the demanding state shall be recognized in lieu of an authenticated copy of an indictment or information. State ex rel. Owens v. Boyer, 207 So.2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). Furthermore, since the provisions of the statute were correctly followed here, we hold that the denial of appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus was proper.

Affirmed.

OTT, C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shufty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 1, 1982
419 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Shufty v. State

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD C. SHUFTY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 1, 1982

Citations

419 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Shapiro v. State

In that situation, the indictment or information does not deprive the affidavit, or its resulting warrant, of…