From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Short v. Bombardier Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 7, 2000

February 24, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated October 29, 1998, which granted the defendants' motion to strike the complaint as a sanction for failing to preserve evidence.

Lawrence V. Carra, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz Dicker, New York, N.Y. (Thomas W. Tobin of counsel), for respondents.

THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN and ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in striking the plaintiff's complaint as a sanction for his failure to preserve evidence crucial to the defense of the case (see,Squitieri v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 201 ; Kirkland v. New York City Hous. Auth., 236 A.D.2d 170 ; Abar v. Freightliner Corp., 208 A.D.2d 999 ).


Summaries of

Short v. Bombardier Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Short v. Bombardier Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD SHORT, appellant, v. BOMBARDIER INC., ET AL., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 502

Citing Cases

Stoebe v. Norton

ORDERED that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and…

Kirschen v. Marino

The gravamen of this burden is a showing of prejudice ( see Favish v. Tepler, 294 AD2d 396; Romano v. Scalia…