From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shomron v. Fuks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 2006
26 A.D.3d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

7979N.

February 28, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered August 29, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, sua sponte, granted defendants a trial preference, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Halperin Law Firm, LLP, New York (Guy S. Halperin of counsel), for appellant.

Fox Horan Camerini, LLP, New York (John R. Horan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in granting defendants a trial preference in the interests of justice (CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; Wolf v. Wolf, 232 AD2d 330). It is apparent from the record that the court assessed the circumstances of defendants' finances presented in their motion papers and properly determined that the earliest possible resolution of these issues would best serve all parties.


Summaries of

Shomron v. Fuks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 2006
26 A.D.3d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Shomron v. Fuks

Case Details

Full title:RUTH SHOMRON, on Behalf of RL REALTY ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. YORAM FUKS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1401
810 N.Y.S.2d 59

Citing Cases

Jordan v. BBP St. Owner, LLC

"Whether the interests of justice will be served by the granting of a preference rests within the discretion…

Gonzalez v. City of New York

It is well established that a preference is not to be lightly granted and that each case must be determined…